Rtx 3080 Vs Rtx 3060 Ti
RTX 3060 Ti vs RTX 3080 12 GB
Price now
478$
Games supported
100%
Toll at present
1365$
Games supported
100%
General info
Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for coin and other general parameters.
Place in performance rating | 23 | 9 |
Place by popularity | 16 |
no data |
Value for money | thirty.01 | 11.43 |
Architecture |
Ampere (2020−2022) |
Ampere (2020−2022) |
GPU code name | Ampere GA104 | Ampere GA102 |
Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Release engagement |
1 Dec 2020 (2 years ago) |
11 January 2022 (less than a twelvemonth ago) |
Launch toll (MSRP) |
$399 |
$799 |
Electric current price | $478 (1.2x MSRP) | $1365 (i.7x MSRP) |
Value for money
To calculate the alphabetize we compare the characteristics of graphics cards against their prices.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such equally number of shaders, GPU cadre base of operations clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you lot have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Annotation that power consumption of some graphics cards tin can well exceed their nominal TDP, peculiarly when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4864 | 8960 |
Cadre clock speed | 1410 MHz |
no data |
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz | 1260 MHz |
Number of transistors | 17,400 meg | 28,300 1000000 |
Manufacturing process technology | eight nm | 8 nm |
Thermal blueprint ability (TDP) | 220 Watt | 350 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 | 478.8 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a hereafter computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and motorcoach (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe four.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 242 mm | 285 mm |
Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pivot | 1x 12-pin |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, motorcoach, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
Maximum RAM amount | eight GB | 12 GB |
Memory jitney width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Retentivity bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 912.iv GB/s |
Shared retentiveness | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-chosen Founders Edition for NVIDIA fries). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the menu itself.
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI two.ane, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
HDMI | + | + |
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.6 |
OpenGL | iv.6 | iv.half dozen |
OpenCL | ii.0 | 3.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2 | one.3 |
CUDA | 8.half dozen | 8.6 |
Benchmark functioning
Non-gaming benchmark functioning comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark operation rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, merely if you detect some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually ready problems quickly.
- Passmark
- 3DMark Vantage Performance
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
- 3DMark Ice Storm GPU
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under diverse load, providing 4 carve up benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, eleven and 12 (the last existence done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 26%
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. Information technology taxes the graphics carte du jour with two scenes, i depicting a girl escaping some militarized base of operations located within a body of water cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy criterion is now recommended to exist used instead.
Criterion coverage: 17%
3DMark eleven is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one existence few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in Jan 2020, 3DMark 11 is at present superseded by Time Spy.
Criterion coverage: 17%
Criterion coverage: 14%
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. Information technology features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a peppery brute seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Burn Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Criterion coverage: fourteen%
Deject Gate is an outdated DirectX eleven feature level 10 criterion that was used for habitation PCs and basic notebooks. Information technology displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. But like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in Jan 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: fourteen%
Ice Tempest Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to mensurate entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets about a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Nighttime Raid.
Benchmark coverage: eight%
Gaming functioning
Permit's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Detail gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS
Hither are the average frames per second in a big set of popular games across unlike resolutions:
Full HD |
149
|
186
|
1440p |
92
|
128
|
4K |
59
|
88
|
Pop games
-
Total HD
Low Preset -
Full Hd
Medium Preset -
Full HD
High Preset -
Full HD
Ultra Preset -
1440p
High Preset -
1440p
Ultra Preset -
4K
High Preset -
4K
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 |
78
|
120−130
|
Assassin'due south Creed Odyssey |
121 +23.5%
|
95−100 −23.5%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla |
95 −17.9%
|
110−120 +17.9%
|
Battlefield 5 |
145 −9.seven%
|
150−160 +9.seven%
|
Phone call of Duty: Modern Warfare |
140−150 −20.four%
|
170−180 +20.4%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 |
78 −61.5%
|
120−130 +61.5%
|
Far Cry five |
154 −eleven%
|
171 +11%
|
Far Cry New Dawn |
115 −18.3%
|
136 +18.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 |
200 +eight.1%
|
180−190 −eight.one%
|
Hitman 3 |
160−170 −21.8%
|
200−210 +21.8%
|
Horizon Nil Dawn |
139 −43.nine%
|
200 +43.9%
|
Reddish Dead Redemption 2 |
154 +33.nine%
|
110−120 −33.nine%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider |
188 −11.2%
|
209 +eleven.ii%
|
Lookout Dogs: Legion |
122 +3.4%
|
118 −iii.4%
|
Assassin's Creed Odyssey |
104 +6.1%
|
95−100 −six.1%
|
Assassin'due south Creed Valhalla |
81 −38.iii%
|
110−120 +38.3%
|
Battlefield 5 |
124 −28.2%
|
150−160 +28.2%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare |
140−150 −20.4%
|
170−180 +20.iv%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 |
78 −61.5%
|
120−130 +61.5%
|
Far Cry five |
146 −xi%
|
162 +11%
|
Far Cry New Dawn |
111 −18%
|
131 +18%
|
Forza Horizon 4 |
196 +5.ix%
|
180−190 −five.9%
|
Hitman 3 |
160−170 −21.8%
|
200−210 +21.8%
|
Horizon Zippo Dawn |
116 −42.ii%
|
165 +42.2%
|
Metro Exodus |
113 −xxx.one%
|
147 +30.1%
|
Ruddy Dead Redemption 2 |
89 −29.2%
|
110−120 +29.2%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider |
162 −24.seven%
|
202 +24.7%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt |
218 −47.2%
|
321 +47.ii%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion |
109 +0.9%
|
108 −0.9%
|
Assassin's Creed Odyssey |
75 −30.7%
|
95−100 +30.7%
|
Assassin'southward Creed Valhalla |
74 −51.4%
|
110−120 +51.4%
|
Battlefield five |
114 −39.5%
|
150−160 +39.v%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 |
77 −63.6%
|
120−130 +63.6%
|
Far Cry 5 |
137 −ten.2%
|
151 +ten.ii%
|
Far Weep New Dawn |
101 −xvi.8%
|
118 +16.8%
|
Forza Horizon 4 |
173 −6.9%
|
180−190 +6.nine%
|
The Witcher iii: Wild Chase |
109 −51.four%
|
165 +51.iv%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion |
77 −23.four%
|
95 +23.iv%
|
Call of Duty: Mod Warfare |
xc−95 −36.3%
|
120−130 +36.three%
|
Hitman 3 |
100−110 −43.3%
|
140−150 +43.three%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn |
92 −43.5%
|
132 +43.5%
|
Metro Exodus |
68 −44.1%
|
98 +44.1%
|
Cherry-red Expressionless Redemption two |
57 −xiv%
|
65−70 +14%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider |
106 −38.7%
|
147 +38.7%
|
Assassin's Creed Odyssey |
65 −12.3%
|
seventy−75 +12.3%
|
Assassin'south Creed Valhalla |
60 −31.seven%
|
75−lxxx +31.7%
|
Battlefield 5 |
98 −32.vii%
|
130−140 +32.7%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 |
52 −36.5%
|
70−75 +36.five%
|
Far Cry five |
110 −33.6%
|
147 +33.half-dozen%
|
Far Cry New Dawn |
94 −23.four%
|
116 +23.4%
|
Forza Horizon 4 |
150 −4%
|
150−160 +4%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion |
59 −42.4%
|
84 +42.4%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare |
50−55 −43.4%
|
75−80 +43.4%
|
Hitman 3 |
55−60 −49.1%
|
85−90 +49.1%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn |
53 −50.9%
|
80 +50.9%
|
Metro Exodus |
44 −47.vii%
|
65 +47.7%
|
Red Dead Redemption ii |
38 −thirteen.2%
|
40−45 +13.two%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider |
58 −43.i%
|
83 +43.ane%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt |
81 −63%
|
132 +63%
|
Assassin's Creed Odyssey |
45 −15.half dozen%
|
50−55 +15.vi%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla |
40 −27.five%
|
50−55 +27.5%
|
Battleground 5 |
65 −36.9%
|
85−xc +36.9%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 |
25 −36%
|
30−35 +36%
|
Far Weep 5 |
65 −56.ix%
|
102 +56.nine%
|
Far Cry New Dawn |
65 −50.viii%
|
98 +fifty.eight%
|
Forza Horizon 4 |
103 −10.7%
|
110−120 +10.7%
|
Lookout man Dogs: Legion |
33 −66.vii%
|
55 +66.7%
|
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance rating | 52.18 | 68.02 |
Recency | 1 December 2020 | 11 January 2022 |
Toll | $399 | $799 |
Memory bus width | 256 | 384 |
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4864 | 8960 |
Memory bandwidth | 448 | 912.4 |
Thermal blueprint power (TDP) | 220 Watt | 350 Watt |
Judging past the results of constructed and gaming tests, Technical City recommends
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB
since information technology shows improve performance.
Should yous however have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments department, and we shall respond.
Cast your vote
Practice you think we are right or mistaken in our pick? Vote past clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.
Competitors of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti by AMD
Nosotros believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce RTX 3060 Ti from AMD is Radeon RX 6750 XT, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by i position in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 3060 Ti:
Competitors of GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB by AMD
Nosotros believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB from AMD is Radeon RX 6900 XT, which is slower by ane% and lower by 1 position in our rating.
Hither are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with functioning more than or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
User rating
Here you lot can come across the user rating of the graphics cards, likewise equally charge per unit them yourself.
Questions and comments
Here you lot can inquire a question nigh this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an mistake or mismatch.
Graphics settings
Screen resolution
FPS
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-RTX-3060-Ti-vs-GeForce-RTX-3080-12-GB