How Does Obesity Affect Public Health Spending?

by -38 views

Continuing Education Activity

Obesity is an alarmingly increasing global public health issue. Several countries worldwide have witnessed a double or triple escalation in the prevalence of obesity in the last three decades, probably due to urbanization, sedentary lifestyle, and increase consumption of high-calorie candy food. The alarming increase in babyhood obesity foreshows a tremendous burden of chronic affliction prevention in the future public healthcare systems worldwide. Obesity prevention is a critical factor in decision-making Obesity-related Not-communicable diseases (OR-NCDs), including diabetes, cardiovascular disease, stroke, hypertension, cancer, and psychological problems. This activity reviews the public wellness considerations in obesity and highlights the role of the interprofessional team in developing public health strategies for the management and prevention of this condition.

Objectives:

  • Review the comorbidities associated with obesity.

  • Outline the psychosocial considerations in people suffering from obesity.

  • Describe the individual and public health consequences of obesity.

  • Identify barriers to the delayed seeking of healthcare and utilization of preventive screening programs by interprofessional team.

Access free multiple choice questions on this topic.

Introduction

Obesity is an alarmingly increasing global public health issue. Obesity is labeled every bit a national epidemic, and obesity affects one in three adults and one in half-dozen children in the Usa.[i][2] Several countries worldwide have witnessed a double or triple escalation in the prevalence of obesity in the concluding 3 decades (Figure 1, Figure2), probably due to urbanization, sedentary lifestyle, and increment consumption of loftier-calorie processed nutrient.[three]

The alarming increase in childhood obesity foreshows a tremendous burden of chronic illness prevention in the future public healthcare systems worldwide. Obesity prevention is a disquisitional factor in controlling Obesity-related Non-communicable diseases (OR-NCDs), including insulin resistance/metabolic syndrome, featuring hyperinsulinemia, blazon ii diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and coronary artery disease.[4][five]

The failure of the traditional obesity control measures has stressed the importance of a new not-stigmatizing public policy arroyo, shifting away from the traditional focus on individual behavior modify towards strategies dealing with ecology alter. The other big challenge related to overweight and obesity is weight bias and discrimination. In public settings such equally piece of work environments, healthcare facilities, and educational setup, obese individuals face bigotry.

Issues of Business concern

Public Health Impact of Obesity

  1. Life expectancy:
    Obesity, the modern lifestyle disease, not simply cause serious illness just also substantially decreases the average public life expectancy. Obesity in adulthood is a strong predictor of early decease. Framingham Centre Study, a prospective cohort study, revealed that adults who were obese at twoscore years lost half-dozen to 7 years of expected life. However, in obese people who smoked, the years of life lost well-nigh doubled.[6]

  2. Quality of life:
    Obesity affects both the physical and psychosocial aspects of quality of life, more meaning among morbidly obese individuals.  The self-perceived Health-related quality of life (HRQL) among obese individuals worsens with increasing BMI. The effect of obesity on HRQL is assessed near ofttimes by SF-36 (Brusk-Form Health Survey), comprising 36 questions covering eight domains including physical operation, concrete role limitations due to physical health problems, social operation, bodily hurting, general mental well being, emotional role limitations, energy, and general health perceptions.[seven][8][9] The risk of suffering from any chronic medical status is almost doubled in morbid obesity compared to overweight individuals.[x] Obesity causes a substantial psychological burden exacerbated past the public’southward marked preoccupation with thinness. Sullivan et al. reported more significant psychosocial consequences in obese women when compared to obese men.[11]

  3. Prevalence of obesity-associated diseases:The individuals who are obese in their babyhood tend to remain obese in machismo and prone to loftier risk for Obesity-related non-communicable diseases (OR-NCD) at a younger historic period.[12] Obesity-related non-infectious disease, including blazon two diabetes, coronary heart disease, stroke, cancer, asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, have increased worldwide. These not-infectious disease are master targets for global disease prevention by WHO.[13] Compared with their normal-weight peers, severely obese individuals lose almost eight disease-complimentary years, and mildly obese individuals lose about four affliction-costless years.[14]

  4. Employment:Obesity is one of the leading reasons for discrimination in the hiring procedure for employment, more noticed amid obese females than obese males.[15] Obesity tin crusade reduced employment and an increment in self-reported piece of work limitations compared to normal-weight individuals.[16]

  5. Economic impact:
    Obesity is estimated to account for more than xx% of all annual health care expenditures in the United states of america.[17] The medical costs are xxx% to 40% higher amidst obese individuals than their normal-weight peers, double the increase attributable to smoking.[18] The direct costs of obesity are attributed to the amount spent on diagnosing and treating obesity and obesity-related chronic comorbid weather such as cardiovascular disease and type ii diabetes. Indirect costs are attributed to the lost wages secondary to illness and premature death, elevated costs paid for disability and insurance claims, and decreased productivity at work.

Clinical Significance

The World Health System describes obesity as an excessive fat accumulation with body mass alphabetize (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2 labeled as overweight and BMI ≥ thirty kg/m2 labeled obesity. The relative gamble of death increases with an increase in BMI. This clan is non-linear, with a much higher relative risk of decease for very high BMI (>30) individuals.[19] The stigma of obesity is a threat to proper healthcare resource utilization, preventing morbidity, and identifying complications early. Obese individuals have lower rates of historic period-appropriate preventive cancer screening.[20][21]

Women who suffer from obesity delay seeking routine gynecological cancer screening due to many social barriers.[22] The compromise in healthcare quality in obese individuals adds to the burden of morbidity and all-cause mortality; This also imposes a significant load on the healthcare system in managing comorbidities of obese individuals. Crucial run a risk factors have been recognized in several studies equally an effort to decrease the obesity brunt, which includes the perinatal factors like maternal antenatal BMI, weight at birth and child’s nutrition in the first three years of life, feeding options (breastfeeding versus formula feeding), and growth blueprint in the start year.[23]

Other Issues

It is imperative to assess and address the barriers that obese patients confront which delay pursuing their healthcare needs. Inadequate healthcare in these patients regarding their presenting complaints and preventive wellness visits leads to public health consequences in obesity. Impairment of efforts in the prevention of obesity cause health and social inequalities.[24]

Public Health Policy and Environmental Changes

Environmental changes are the best initiative in preventing the burden of obesity. A desperate public policy tin can bring a meaning environmental change, of which some are listed below.

  1. Nutrient and Drug Assistants (FDA) has fabricated food labeling regulations that mandate calorie and nutrition labeling in all food products.

  2. The FDA has officially banned trans fats in all foods sold in restaurants and grocery stores.

  3. Obesity prevention priorities should focus more than on children, particularly in schools encouraging healthy habits.  The local regime should restrict commercial permits for fast-nutrient restaurants nearby schools (within 0.5 miles) and encourage healthy food vendors to plant almost schools.[25]

  4. School-level policies should meliorate concrete education at school and encourage walking or biking to school.

  5. Levying significant taxation for unhealthy nutrient and subsidizing salubrious food are crucial strategies to forbid obesity but with few ethical limitations. Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages such equally soft drinks have been applied at most state and urban center levels.[26]

  6. Public health policy should focus on designing activity-friendly communities past creating bike and walking paths.

Family-Based Interventions

The family-based arroyo is the best intervention to sustain weight loss and have weight maintenance among patients with overweight or obesity. The overweight subjects living in a family will have meaning difficulties changing their lifestyle without family support. Several studies have proven that a depression-fat diet with high protein and a low glycemic index effectively sustains weight maintenance and weight regain.[27][28] An easy-to-use tool in family unit-based dietary intervention is the traffic light diet in which nutrient is classified as dark-green, scarlet, and yellowish.[29]

Weight Bias in Health Care
(Figure iii)

The weight bias in the health care arrangement can be explicit (consciously expressed) or implicit (involuntarily expressed). Implicit weight bias is not rare to see amongst Health care providers. Society’due south negative biases towards overweight or obesity ofttimes are shared and exhibited by the wellness care provider (HCP). The weight bias past the health care squad can impair the patient’southward wellness care quality. Most HCPs believe in the free energy rest theory of weight control, which encourages the thinking of obesity issues being a personal responsibility and limiting the scope of advisable counseling.[xxx] The following interventions could assistance in reducing the weight bias in health exercise.

  1. To educate the health care professionals most the complex etiology of obesity, including genetic, metabolic, and social factors.

  2. To brand providers aware of the fact that the weight bias could influence the quality of the intendance.

  3. To railroad train the medical trainees how to communicate without implicit bias.

  4. Another strategy is to betrayal counter-stereotypical exemplars of people with obesity who are successful and intelligent.

  5. HCPs should address the overall health and the patient’due south understanding of obesity-associated comorbidities along with weight loss management.

  6. HCPs should be encouraged to employ people-commencement language, e.thousand., patients with obesity instead of obese patients. Besides, using terminology similar high BMI instead of morbid obesity volition assistance in motivating the patient.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Obesity is a national epidemic affecting every i in three adults and one in half-dozen children in the United States of America. The rise trend has been attributed to alter in ecology and food practices in the face of the increasingly sedentary lifestyles of people. Tracking childhood obesity into machismo poses a significant burden on the healthcare system for managing this and its complications. Obesity is crucial to developing non-communicable diseases (OR-NCD), which include diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery diseases, to name a few. The psychological attribute regarding the stigma of obesity leads to delay in seeking healthcare in these individuals.

While the master care md diagnoses obesity, information technology is as important to consult with an interprofessional team of specialists, including dieticians, psychologists, behavioral counselors, and do specialists. When managing a kid with obesity, consultation with pediatric endocrinologists, neurologists, and surgeons also has a vital role in the child’south growth. Nurse practitioners are a vital part of the interprofessional group every bit continued and frequent motivation is needed to inculcate positive health-related changes in their daily life.

Primary care physicians can help these patients past constantly monitoring their weight and BMI and regularly scheduling annual health maintenance visits. The physician should make an effort to address whatever barriers that the patient perceives related to seeking healthcare. Dieticians are intrinsically involved in the direction and can assist create a nutrition programme considering the patient’south personal choices and behavior. Practice specialists can make age-appropriate recommendations for exercise for the patient too as family activities.

Psychological bug play a significant role in the development of maladaptive eating patterns in children and adults. The part of behavioral counselors and schoolhouse-based health groups in managing children with obesity is crucial. The role of public wellness policymakers becomes pivotal because obesity is a preventable affliction. Coordination betwixt healthcare providers and policymakers, operating as an interprofessional team, is essential to gauge the brunt of the disease, accost the barriers to seeking treatment and preventive screenings. The failure of the traditional obesity control measures has stressed the importance of developing a new non-stigmatizing public policy arroyo by public health officials.

Review Questions

Figure

Figure 1: Trends in obesity among children. Contributed by the centers for Affliction control (CDC)

Figure 2: Trends in obesity among adults

Figure

Effigy two: Trends in obesity among adults. Contributed past the centers for Affliction control (CDC)

Figure 3: The impact of Weight bias

Figure

Figure 3: The impact of Weight bias. Contributed by Palanikumar Balasundaram Physician

References

ane.

Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2008.

JAMA.
2010 Jan 20;303(iii):235-41.

[PubMed: 20071471]

2.

Mokdad AH, Serdula MK, Dietz WH, Bowman BA, Marks JS, Koplan JP. The spread of the obesity epidemic in the United states of america, 1991-1998.

JAMA.
1999 October 27;282(16):1519-22.

[PubMed: 10546690]

3.

Finucane MM, Stevens GA, Cowan MJ, Danaei G, Lin JK, Paciorek CJ, Singh GM, Gutierrez Hour, Lu Y, Bahalim AN, Farzadfar F, Riley LM, Ezzati G., Global Burden of Metabolic Risk Factors of Chronic Diseases Collaborating Group (Body Mass Index). National, regional, and global trends in body-mass index since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 960 state-years and nine·1 1000000 participants.

Lancet.
2011 Feb 12;377(9765):557-67.

[PMC free article: PMC4472365] [PubMed: 21295846]

4.

Henry FJ. Obesity prevention: the key to not-communicable affliction command.

Westward Indian Med J.
2011 Jul;60(4):446-51.

[PubMed: 22097676]

5.

Misra A, Khurana L. Obesity-related non-infectious disease: Due south Asians vs White Caucasians.

Int J Obes (Lond).
2011 Feb;35(two):167-87.

[PubMed: 20644557]

vi.

Peeters A, Barendregt JJ, Willekens F, Mackenbach JP, Al Mamun A, Bonneux L., NEDCOM, the Netherlands Epidemiology and Demography Compression of Morbidity Research Group. Obesity in adulthood and its consequences for life expectancy: a life-table analysis.

Ann Intern Med.
2003 January 07;138(i):24-32.

[PubMed: 12513041]

vii.

Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Med Care.
1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.

[PubMed: 1593914]

viii.

Fontaine KR, Cheskin LJ, Barofsky I. Health-related quality of life in obese persons seeking handling.

J Fam Pract.
1996 Sep;43(3):265-70.

[PubMed: 8797754]

9.

Richards MM, Adams TD, Hunt SC. Functional status and emotional well-being, dietary intake, and concrete activity of severely obese subjects.

J Am Diet Assoc.
2000 Jan;100(1):67-75.

[PubMed: 10646007]

ten.

Doll HA, Petersen SE, Stewart-Dark-brown SL. Obesity and physical and emotional well-being: associations betwixt torso mass alphabetize, chronic illness, and the concrete and mental components of the SF-36 questionnaire.

Obes Res.
2000 Mar;8(2):160-lxx.

[PubMed: 10757202]

11.

Sullivan One thousand, Karlsson J, Sjöström Fifty, Backman L, Bengtsson C, Bouchard C, Dahlgren Due south, Jonsson E, Larsson B, Lindstedt S. Swedish obese subjects (SOS)–an intervention written report of obesity. Baseline evaluation of health and psychosocial functioning in the first 1743 subjects examined.

Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord.
1993 Sep;17(9):503-12.

[PubMed: 8220652]

12.

Balasundaram P, Krishna S.
StatPearls [Internet].
StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Jun 29, 2021. Obesity Furnishings On Child Wellness. [PubMed: 34033375]

13.

GBD 2016 Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sexual practice specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Illness Study 2016.

Lancet.
2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1151-1210.

[PMC free article: PMC5605883] [PubMed: 28919116]

14.

Nyberg ST, Derailed GD, Pentti J, Virtanen G, Alfredsson L, Fransson EI, Goldberg M, Heikkilä Yard, Jokela M, Knutsson A, Koskenvuo Chiliad, Lallukka T, Leineweber C, Lindbohm JV, Madsen IEH, Magnusson Hanson LL, Nordin One thousand, Oksanen T, Pietiläinen O, Rahkonen O, Rugulies R, Shipley MJ, Stenholm S, Suominen S, Theorell T, Vahtera J, Westerholm PJM, Westerlund H, Zins Grand, Hamer Yard, Singh-Manoux A, Bell JA, Ferrie JE, Kivimäki M. Obesity and loss of disease-free years attributable to major non-communicable diseases: a multicohort written report.

Lancet Public Wellness.
2018 Oct;three(x):e490-e497.

[PMC free article: PMC6178874] [PubMed: 30177479]

15.

Flintstone SW, Čadek M, Codreanu SC, Ivić Five, Zomer C, Gomoiu A. Obesity Bigotry in the Recruitment Process: “You’re Not Hired!”.

Front Psychol.
2016;seven:647.

[PMC free article: PMC4853419] [PubMed: 27199869]

sixteen.

Tunceli Thou, Li K, Williams LK. Long-term effects of obesity on employment and work limitations among U.S. Adults, 1986 to 1999.

Obesity (Argent Spring).
2006 Sep;xiv(ix):1637-46.

[PubMed: 17030975]

17.

Finkelstein EA, Trogdon JG, Cohen JW, Dietz Due west. Annual medical spending attributable to obesity: payer-and service-specific estimates.

Health Aff (Millwood).
2009 Sep-Oct;28(5):w822-31.

[PubMed: 19635784]

18.

Spieker EA, Pyzocha N. Economic Impact of Obesity.

Prim Care.
2016 Mar;43(one):83-95, eight-ix.

[PubMed: 26896202]

xix.

Pajak A, Topór-Madry R, Waśkiewicz A, Sygnowska E. Trunk mass index and risk of death in centre-anile men and women in Poland. Results of Politico-MONICA cohort study.

Kardiol Pol.
2005 Feb;62(2):95-105; give-and-take 106-7.

[PubMed: 15815793]

20.

Ferrante JM, Ohman-Strickland P, Hudson SV, Hahn KA, Scott JG, Crabtree BF. Colorectal cancer screening among obese versus non-obese patients in primary care practices.

Cancer Observe Prev.
2006;thirty(v):459-65.

[PMC costless article: PMC1761119] [PubMed: 17067753]

21.

Mitchell RS, Padwal RS, Chuck AW, Klarenbach SW. Cancer screening among the overweight and obese in Canada.

Am J Prev Med.
2008 Aug;35(2):127-32.

[PubMed: 18617081]

22.

Amy NK, Aalborg A, Lyons P, Keranen 50. Barriers to routine gynecological cancer screening for White and African-American obese women.

Int J Obes (Lond).
2006 Jan;30(ane):147-55.

[PubMed: 16231037]

23.

Tiwari A, Balasundaram P.
StatPearls [Cyberspace].
StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Aug 22, 2021. Obesity in Pediatric Patients. [PubMed: 34033388]

24.

Puhl RM, Heuer CA. Obesity stigma: important considerations for public health.

Am J Public Health.
2010 Jun;100(half dozen):1019-28.

[PMC free article: PMC2866597] [PubMed: 20075322]

25.

Davis B, Carpenter C. Proximity of fast-food restaurants to schools and adolescent obesity.

Am J Public Health.
2009 Mar;99(3):505-10.

[PMC free article: PMC2661452] [PubMed: 19106421]

26.

Zhang Q, Liu S, Liu R, Xue H, Wang Y. Nutrient Policy Approaches to Obesity Prevention: An International Perspective.

Curr Obes Rep.
2014 Jun;iii(two):171-82.

[PMC complimentary article: PMC4333683] [PubMed: 25705571]

27.

Larsen TM, Dalskov South, van Baak G, Jebb S, Kafatos A, Pfeiffer A, Martinez JA, Handjieva-Darlenska T, Kunesová Chiliad, Holst C, Saris WH, Astrup A. The Diet, Obesity and Genes (Diogenes) Dietary Written report in eight European countries – a comprehensive design for long-term intervention.

Obes Rev.
2010 January;11(ane):76-91.

[PubMed: 19470086]

28.

McMillan-Toll J, Petocz P, Atkinson F, O’neill M, Samman S, Steinbeck K, Caterson I, Brand-Miller J. Comparison of four diets of varying glycemic load on weight loss and cardiovascular chance reduction in overweight and obese young adults: a randomized controlled trial.

Arch Intern Med.
2006 Jul 24;166(14):1466-75.

[PubMed: 16864756]

29.

Chocolate-brown RD. The traffic light diet can lower take chances for obesity and diabetes.

NASN Sch Nurse.
2011 May;26(three):152-4.

[PubMed: 21675296]

30.

Foster GD, Wadden TA, Makris AP, Davidson D, Sanderson RS, Allison DB, Kessler A. Primary care physicians’ attitudes about obesity and its handling.

Obes Res.
2003 Oct;11(10):1168-77.

[PubMed: 14569041]

Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK572122/