Difference Between Jbl Live And Tune

If you’re looking at either the JBL Live 660NC or Melody 660NC, you’re likely wondering how they differ from ane another, and why the Alive 660NC ($199) is twice the cost of the Tune 660NC ($99). Well, I’ve spent the mean solar day listening to both and comparing the 2, then let’s talk about what your money volition get you with each, and which is most worth it for you.

Looks and Comfort

At offset, these two headphones may wait relatively similar, but upon further inspection, there are some primal differences. What I first noticed was that the ear cups on the Live 660 were virtually twice the size of those on the Tune 660. While both are technically on ear headphones, the Live 660 almost feels like an over ear headphone (a headphone that surrounds the ears instead of sitting on top of them).

The Live 660 also has a softer, fabric headband as apposed to the mostly hard plastic headband on the Tune 660, which does still have some padding at the top of it. Both accept a tight fit, with the Live 660 fitting a bit tighter than the Tune 660. Combined with it’s larger ear cups, the Alive 660’due south fit definitely makes for more successful sound isolation than the Melody 660, but not by a huge corporeality. Both headphones are on like levels of comfort, but the Alive 660 shows its higher price tag at the end of the solar day.

Sound Quality

These both take the signature JBL sound in many respects, with a noticeable tint added to the texture of each song. If you oasis’t used a JBL headphone before, they have a warmer feel to them with a subtly vintage edge, just all the same retain an overall modern cleanliness. The Live and Tune 660 seem to take unlike approaches to their tuning overall, however. The Live 660 has a much more even, balanced sound, while the Tune 660 makes a significant boost of the mid range and noticeable cut of the low cease. On the other hand, the Live 660 has a more smoothed out, neutral mid range and a prissy boost to the bass thatgives it more intensity, punch, and body.

I’d say the Live 660 is best suited for more modernistic music, whether it be hip-hop, pop, or electronic. Its stronger bass response and less biased mid range arrive very versatile, but it definitely caters to the cinematic experience of the 21st century. The Tune 660 may non give you quite the aforementioned fullness of character for glossy, booming new-aged music, just could exist a better choice for more classic or old-school compositions. Because of its somewhat sharpened sound, it’s able to bring out vocals, guitars, keyboards etc. from the sometimes thinner sounds of older recordings. It also adds a nice edge and extra texture to many elements, along with smoothing out the treble to proceed there from being too much hiss.The Live 660 does not have the added mid range presence the Tune 660 does, instead deciding to place about of its attention on the low stop and treble brightness.

Overall

To me, the Live 660 was overall a flake cleaner and more fifty-fifty-keel of a audio than the Melody 660, but it’s not a 1 size fits all. If yous’re looking for a JBL headphone or a bluetooth headphone and are hard set on non spending more than $100, the Tune 660 definitely isn’t a cop out and past no means does it pale in comparing to its more expensive counterparts. However, if yous detect you have pickier, more critical ears and can swing the actress cash without much strain on your wallet, the Live 660 may better satisfy those with more than particular sense of taste.

You tin purchase the JBL Alive 660NC and JBL Tune 660NC at
Audio46