Amd A4 Vs Intel Celeron N4020
AMD A4-9125 vs Intel Celeron N4020
Comparison of the technical characteristics betwixt the processors, with the AMD A4-9125 on one side and the Intel Celeron N4020 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the notebook sector, Information technology has 2 cores, ii threads, a maximum frequency of 2.6GHz. The second is used on the entry-level notebook segment, it has a full of 2 cores, two threads, its turbo frequency is prepare to 2.viii GHz. The following tabular array also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM retentiveness capacity, the type of retention accustomed, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench iv and Cinebench R15.
Notation: Commissions may exist earned from the links higher up.
This page contains references to products from 1 or more than of our advertisers. Nosotros may receive compensation when you click on links to those products. For an caption of our advertising policy, please visit this page.
Specifications:
| Processor | AMD A4-9125 | Intel Celeron N4020 | ||||||
| Market (main) | Notebook | Entry-level notebook | ||||||
| ISA | x86-64 (64 bit) | x86-64 (64 flake) | ||||||
| Microarchitecture | Excavator | Goldmont Plus | ||||||
| Core name | Stoney Ridge | Gemini Lake Refresh | ||||||
| Family | A4-9000 | Celeron 4000 | ||||||
| Part number(s), Southward-Spec | AM9125AYN23AC | FH8068003067426, SRET0 |
||||||
| Release date | Q4 2018 | Q4 2019 | ||||||
| Lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm | ||||||
| Transistors | 1,200,000,000 | - | ||||||
| Cores | 2 | ii | ||||||
| Threads | two | 2 | ||||||
| Base of operations frequency | 2.3 GHz | 1.1 GHz | ||||||
| Turbo frequency | ii.6 GHz | ii.8 GHz | ||||||
| Enshroud retention | ane MB | four MB | ||||||
| Max memory capacity | 12 GB | 8 GB | ||||||
| Retentivity types | DDR4-1866 | DDR4/LPDDR4 | ||||||
| Max # of retention channels | 1 | 2 | ||||||
| Max retentiveness bandwidth | 13.91 GB/due south | 38.iv GB/s | ||||||
| Max PCIe lanes | eight | half dozen | ||||||
| TDP | 15 W | 6 Due west | ||||||
| GPU integrated graphics | AMD Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics (Stoney) | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | ||||||
| GPU cores | ii | - | ||||||
| GPU execution units | - | 12 | ||||||
| GPU shading units | 128 | 96 | ||||||
| GPU base of operations clock | 200 MHz | 200 MHz | ||||||
| GPU heave clock | 686 MHz | 650 MHz | ||||||
| GPU FP32 floating point | 167.vii GFLOPS | 144 GFLOPS | ||||||
| Socket | BGA | BGA1090 | ||||||
| Maximum temperature | 90°C | 105°C | ||||||
| CPU-Z single thread | 142 | 206 | ||||||
| CPU-Z multi thread | 265 | 418 | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 single thread | 60 | eighty | ||||||
| Cinebench R15 multi-thread | 100 | 145 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 single thread | 160 | 170 | ||||||
| Cinebench R20 multi-thread | 240 | 300 | ||||||
| PassMark single thread | one,028 | one,188 | ||||||
| PassMark CPU Marking | 1,202 | ane,578 | ||||||
|
(Windows 64-fleck) Geekbench 4 single cadre |
ane,560 | 1,991 | ||||||
|
(Windows 64-bit) Geekbench four multi-cadre |
2,393 | 3,426 | ||||||
|
(Windows) Geekbench 5 single core |
308 | 468 | ||||||
|
(Windows) Geekbench 5 multi-core |
518 | 851 | ||||||
|
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance |
28.83 GFLOPS | 24.5 GFLOPS | ||||||
|
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio |
160 pts / W | 571 pts / W | ||||||
| Amazon |
|
|
||||||
| eBay |
|
|
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links to a higher place.
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a toll less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
We see that the 2 processors accept an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of Intel Celeron N4020 is bigger, that the thermal dissipation power of Intel Celeron N4020 is less. The Intel Celeron N4020 was started more recently.
Performances :
Operation comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| CPU-Z - Multi-thread & unmarried thread score | |
|---|---|
Intel Celeron N4020
|
206 418 |
| AMD A4-9125
|
142 265 |
In unmarried cadre, the departure is 45%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 58%.
Annotation: Commissions may exist earned from the links in a higher place. These scores are only an
boilerplate of the performances got with these processors, you may go unlike results.
CPU-Z is a system information software that provides the name of the processor, its model number, the codename, the enshroud levels, the package, the process. It can also gives data near the mainboard, the memory. It makes real time measurement, with finally a benchmark for the unmarried thread, as well every bit for the multi thread.
| Cinebench R15 - Multi-thread & unmarried thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Celeron N4020
|
80 145 |
| AMD A4-9125
|
sixty 100 |
In single cadre, the difference is 33%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 45%.
Notation: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are just an
average of the performances got with these processors, yous may get dissimilar results.
Cinebench R15 evaluates the functioning of CPU calculations by restoring a photorealistic 3D scene. The scene has 2,000 objects, 300,000 polygons, uses abrupt and fuzzy reflections, bright areas, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and so on. The faster the rendering of the scene is created, the more powerful the PC is, with a high number of points.
| Cinebench R20 - Multi-thread & unmarried thread score | |
|---|---|
| Intel Celeron N4020
|
170 300 |
| AMD A4-9125
|
160 240 |
In single core, the deviation is 6%. In multi-core, the departure in terms of gap is 25%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links above. These scores are only an
boilerplate of the performances got with these processors, yous may get dissimilar results.
Cinebench R20 is a multi-platform test software which allows to evaluate the hardware capacities of a device such every bit a computer, a tablet, a server. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest improvements in rendering techniques. The evaluation is ultimately fifty-fifty more relevant.
| PassMark - CPU Marker & single thread | |
|---|---|
| Intel Celeron N4020
|
one,188 ane,578 |
| AMD A4-9125
|
1,028 i,202 |
In unmarried core, the difference is 16%. In multi-cadre, the difference in terms of gap is 31%.
Note: Commissions may be earned from the links to a higher place. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get unlike results.
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several functioning tests including prime number numbers, integers, floating signal, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the college is the device capacity.
On Windows 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-cadre & single core score - Windows 64-fleck | |
|---|---|
| Intel Celeron N4020
|
ane,991 iii,426 |
| AMD A4-9125
|
1,560 2,393 |
In single core, the deviation is 28%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 43%.
On Android 64-bit:
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-cadre & single core score - Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Intel Celeron N4020
|
two,192 three,768 |
| AMD A4-9125
|
ane,973 ii,976 |
In single core, the departure is 11%. In multi-cadre, the difference in terms of gap is 27%.
Note: Commissions may exist earned from the links above. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, you may get different results.
Geekbench four is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each consequence, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
On Windows:
| Geekbench v - Multi-core & single core score - Windows | |
|---|---|
| Intel Celeron N4020
|
468 851 |
| AMD A4-9125
|
308 518 |
In unmarried core, the divergence is 52%. In multi-core, the divergence in terms of gap is 64%.
On Android:
| Geekbench v - Multi-cadre & single cadre score - Android | |
|---|---|
| Intel Celeron N4020
|
469 867 |
| AMD A4-9125
|
408 667 |
In single core, the difference is 15%. In multi-cadre, the deviation in terms of gap is 30%.
Notation: Commissions may be earned from the links higher up. These scores are only an
average of the performances got with these processors, yous may get unlike results.
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes information technology possible to improve compare the ability of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench v includes new workloads that stand for work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
AMD A4-9125 Intel equivalentIntel Celeron N4020 AMD equivalent
Come across also:
AMD A4-9120AMD A4-9120CAMD A4-9120e
Disclaimer:
When y'all click on links to various merchants on this site and make a buy, this can issue in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes chapter links for which the ambassador of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no actress cost to yous should you lot make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
Information:
We do non assume any responsibility for the information displayed on our website. Please use at your ain risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer's website to detect the latest upward-to-date data regarding the specifics of these products.
Source: https://gadgetversus.com/processor/amd-a4-9125-vs-intel-celeron-n4020/
